EU Trade Deal Threatens UK Farmers With Unnecessary Glyphosate Restrictions
A potential trade agreement with the EU could impose burdensome regulations on UK agriculture, jeopardizing food production and economic stability.

London - A new trade deal being negotiated with the European Union threatens to impose unwarranted restrictions on the use of glyphosate, a vital tool for UK farmers. This move could undermine agricultural productivity, raise food costs for consumers, and cede control of British farming practices to foreign regulators. Glyphosate, a safe and effective herbicide, is used by UK farmers to desiccate crops before harvest, improving efficiency and reducing costs. The EU banned this practice in 2023, citing health concerns that lack scientific consensus.
Officials from the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) are engaged in discussions with EU counterparts to finalize a trade agreement aimed at facilitating trade. However, environmental groups are exploiting this opportunity to push for the adoption of EU regulations, potentially harming British agriculture.
Organizations such as the Soil Association, the Nature Friendly Farming Network, Greenpeace, and the Wildlife Trusts are lobbying Defra to end the pre-harvest use of glyphosate. They claim that this will alleviate public health and environmental concerns while improving trade relations with the EU. However, their arguments ignore the benefits of glyphosate for farmers and the potential economic consequences of restricting its use.
The World Health Organization’s 2015 classification of glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic to humans" is often cited as justification for restrictions. However, this classification is disputed by many scientists and regulatory bodies. Furthermore, the numerous lawsuits in the United States alleging that glyphosate causes cancer lack definitive scientific proof.
While some studies suggest potential risks associated with glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs), the overall evidence is inconclusive. Calls for regulatory agencies to treat glyphosate as hazardous are premature and could have significant negative impacts on agriculture.
Despite these concerns, glyphosate remains an essential tool for UK farmers. Data indicates that 41% of UK cereal crops tested between 2016 and 2023 contained glyphosate residues. In 2024, 28% of tested UK bread samples also contained the herbicide, demonstrating its widespread use in food production.
Cathy Cliff, campaigns coordinator for the Soil Association, advocates for the removal of glyphosate from the food supply, citing a lack of a “safe dose.” However, these claims are not supported by sound science and could lead to unnecessary regulations that harm farmers and consumers.


