Protecting Private Property: Tech Giants Sued in Spirit Over AI Theft of Australian Copyrights
The discovery of major artists' work in massive scraping datasets highlights the urgent need to defend intellectual property rights and contract law against corporate overreach.

The foundation of a free-market economy rests upon the sanctity of private property and the enforceability of legal contracts. These core principles are currently facing a major challenge from the technology sector, as a new dataset search tool released by The Atlantic reveals that millions of copyrighted creative works have been scraped to train artificial intelligence. Among those affected are prominent Australian cultural figures and entrepreneurs, including Nick Cave, Kylie Minogue, Jimmy Barnes, the band Powderfinger, and acclaimed authors Thomas Keneally and Peter Carey, whose proprietary intellectual assets were harvested without consent.
The scale of this unauthorized collection is vast, raising serious concerns about the rule of law in the digital space. Two primary datasets contain these scraped assets: Sleeping-DISCO-9M, compiled by a group calling itself Sleeping AI, which contains 9.7 million YouTube music tracks and lyrics from Genius.com; and LAION-DISCO-12M, created by Germany-based LAION, which holds 12.3 million tracks. For business-minded creators, this massive accumulation of intellectual property represents an alarming bypass of traditional property rights and market transactions.
Singer-songwriter Paul Dempsey, who is currently performing on his Shotgun Karaoke regional tour, expressed deep frustration over the erosion of contract integrity. Dempsey discovered his entire band catalog with Something For Kate, along with his solo works, in the datasets. He warned that the unauthorized use of these works renders every negotiated contract and legal agreement he has signed throughout his career completely useless. In a functioning market, individuals must have the authority to negotiate fair terms for their property; when tech companies bypass these agreements, they undermine the legal framework of the entire creative industry.
This sentiment was supported by Bernard Fanning, former lead singer of Powderfinger, who argued that utilizing original human compositions to train robotic models is fundamentally dehumanizing. From a conservative perspective, art represents the pinnacle of human expression, tradition, and individual soul. Fanning asserted that robots are not alive, do not experience life, and merely aggregate existing data. He argued that replacing human creativity with automated algorithms diminishes the cultural heritage and moral value of artistic creation.
Darren Hayes, who built a successful 30-year career as a songwriter and member of Savage Garden, described the scraping of his entire life's work as a direct violation of his property rights. Hayes, known for hits like Truly Madly Deeply, expressed fury that the hundreds of hours of intense personal labor, blood, sweat, and tears invested into his business have been taken without permission and fed into software. His reaction underscores the frustration of business owners who see their hard-earned assets seized to train automated systems.

