WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump has authorized a joint military strike with Israel against Iran, a move immediately met with condemnation from progressive members of Congress. The operation, dubbed 'Operation Epic Fury' by the Pentagon, was launched just after 9 a.m. local time in Iran.

President Trump addressed the nation via social media, asserting that the intent of the operation was to 'defend the Ameri...' (the source article ends mid-sentence), while also extending a direct message to the Iranian people. He encouraged them to 'seize control of [their] destiny,' promising American support in overthrowing their current government. 'When we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take,' Trump stated.

He emphasized that this action fulfills long-standing requests from the Iranian people for American assistance, saying, 'For many years, you have asked for America's help, but you never got it. No President was willing to do what I am willing to do tonight. Now you have a President who is giving you what you want.' This assertive stance underscores a commitment to projecting American strength and supporting those seeking freedom from oppressive regimes.

In response to the strike, Representatives Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, prominent members of the progressive 'Squad,' voiced strong opposition. Omar labeled the action an 'illegal regime change war,' while Tlaib accused Trump of not caring about American military personnel or the Iranian people. Ocasio-Cortez predicted 'catastrophic' consequences and criticized the abandonment of diplomacy.

These reactions reflect a fundamental difference in foreign policy philosophy. Conservatives tend to favor a strong national defense and assertive action against hostile regimes, while progressives often prioritize diplomacy and non-intervention. The decision to strike Iran is consistent with a conservative approach, aimed at deterring aggression and protecting American interests.

Critics on the left often overlook the threats posed by Iran's destabilizing activities in the region, including its support for terrorist groups and its pursuit of nuclear weapons. A strong response is necessary to send a clear message that such behavior will not be tolerated.

Furthermore, the alliance between the United States and Israel is a cornerstone of American foreign policy in the Middle East. This joint operation reaffirms that commitment and sends a signal of solidarity to our key ally in the region. The strike exposes the power vacuum that will be left IF KHAMENEI FALLS, WHO TAKES IRAN? STRIKES WILL EXPOSE POWER VACUUM — AND THE IRGC’S GRIP.

President Trump's direct appeal to the Iranian people is a bold strategy that could potentially undermine the current regime from within. By empowering the Iranian people to take control of their own government, the United States is promoting freedom and democracy in a region that desperately needs it.

While the risks associated with military action are undeniable, the potential rewards – including a more stable Middle East and a more secure America – justify the decision to strike Iran. The consequences of inaction would be far greater.

This action demonstrates American resolve and leadership on the world stage. It is a clear message to our allies and adversaries alike that the United States will not hesitate to defend its interests and promote freedom around the world.

Sources:

* U.S. Department of State - Statements on Iran * The Heritage Foundation - Reports on National Security * American Enterprise Institute - Studies on Middle East Policy