Platner's Past Statements Raise Questions About Fitness for Office
Maine Senate candidate's controversial online posts and attempts to explain them spark concerns about judgment and character.

Graham Platner, the Democratic candidate vying for Senator Susan Collins' seat in Maine, faces mounting scrutiny over past social media posts that cast doubt on his judgment and suitability for public office. These posts, unearthed ahead of November’s midterm elections, reveal a pattern of inflammatory rhetoric and questionable decision-making.
In 2020, Platner criticized the use of PTSD as an excuse for misconduct, specifically in response to a case involving police officers who killed animals. Despite his own PTSD diagnosis, Platner wrote, "Don’t buy into that bull----... I did 4 tours in the infantry to Iraq and Afghanistan, saw all kinds of awful things, have a PTSD diagnosis and STILL manage not to beat defenseless animals to death for fun." This statement, made on the r/SocialistRA subreddit, reveals a dismissive attitude towards the struggles of others and a lack of empathy, traits not typically associated with effective leadership.
Platner's attempt to now explain away these and other controversial posts by citing his own PTSD diagnosis raises further questions. While acknowledging the challenges faced by veterans returning from combat is essential, using PTSD as a blanket excuse for offensive behavior is disingenuous and undermines the seriousness of the condition.
"This was a time in my life where I was struggling deeply," Platner said, attributing his online activity to the disillusionment and isolation he felt after leaving the military. However, voters must consider whether such struggles provide sufficient justification for the type of language and sentiments expressed in his past posts.
The character and judgment of elected officials are paramount, particularly in an era of increasing political polarization. Platner’s past statements, coupled with his attempts to rationalize them, raise legitimate concerns about his ability to represent the values and interests of the people of Maine.
Furthermore, Platner's association with the r/SocialistRA subreddit warrants further examination. The views expressed on this forum often diverge significantly from mainstream American values, and Platner's participation raises questions about his ideological alignment.
As the election approaches, voters must carefully weigh the evidence and consider whether Platner's past actions and explanations demonstrate the integrity and sound judgment required of a United States Senator. Senator Collins, a respected voice of moderation and reason, offers a stark contrast to Platner's record of controversy and questionable decision-making.
The future of Maine and the nation depends on electing leaders who are committed to upholding traditional values and serving with honor and integrity. Platner’s past statements suggest that he may not be the right choice to represent the people of Maine in the United States Senate.
CNN first reported on Platner’s activity on the r/SocialistRA subreddit and other Reddit forums. The Washington Post also obtained a since-deleted message from 2013 in which Platner discussed a video promoting female underwear designed to prevent rape.


